Журнал «История: факты и символы»

PROBLEMS OF POWER RELATIONS BETWEEN THE CENTER AND THE REGION ON the EXAMPLE of SIBERIA, the NEP

Author: Baksheev I.A.

The subject of the study is to analyze the management of the border regions by the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which has always been complex and social, and scientific issues. Centre for various reasons not always functioned and not quite effective, although, on the other hand, according to clearly elaborated system of administrative regions. New laws aimed at reforming the administrative system, taken without disturbing the foundations of Soviet power. Management suburbs was transformed slowly and accompanied by a number, as a rule, the objective of complications. Methods: The methodology of work is predetermined identity of the material. It became the basis of the analytical method for the study of sources. Specificity grasped the material demanded a kind of approach, associated with the need to attract the history and methods of textual criticism to determine the relationship of scientific ideas, correlated with each other in the context of a confrontation between the studied succession issues. The article used a systematic approach and traditional methods of dialectical mysletvorchestva principles of historicism and specificity. The novelty of the research lies in the introduction to the scientific revolution of new data that has not previously been analyzed and discussed in the circles of local historians. The article helps to expand the basic concepts related to the characteristics of power relations in the region and the center of the example of Siberia the NEP used modern historical science. Scientific findings influence the processes of long-term management study Siberian peasants in the XIX century (including a system of self-government), its radical transformation in the Soviet era; modern analysis of the government's policy towards the peasants in the XIX - early XX century and in different time periods of Soviet history of the XX century. The results are qualitatively complement the existing knowledge in the modern historical science in Russia and will be useful in the continuing study of the appeal by the author topic.